Yes. Android is hot but the shortcomings are not!
[info]swestar
There's no need for me to convince you that Android is hot, it's got amazing momentum behind it right now. Users can testify it's a geeks nirvana playing with costum ROMs tinkering and downloading apps - in short you won't get bored that easily. In fact I'd say it's more fun than a jailbroken iphone OS device.


If you're not a tinkering geek
If you're not a tinkering geek and consider buying one for everyday use I'd suggest you to do some research, ask in forums, find out what shortcomings might pull you off from a purchasein general or with the particular device you want to buy.

If you are a phone geek and don't care about about battery life, and a light weight OS and you want what's hot in town then go for an Android device (careful buying Samsung - proven trackrecord of releasing few updates and doesn't show a will to backup their devices with firmware updates)

Wich Android device? Depends: battery life, primary device, screen size, heavy usage?
It's hard to say what's better: depends entirely on you! How often do you change phones, what's your usage like (light, medium or heavy web user) do you get bored of solid yet no fun phones often, do you rely heavily on your primary phone for calls/texting , how important is battery life (do you use it at work etc.)

You pay for (Irrelevant?!) Cosmetic User Interfaces: HTC Sense UI, Motorola Blur, SonyEricsson's UX...

The Register wrote an article about the conflicts between Google and the cosmetic UI efforts by OEMs to differentiate the products. I mean we clearly are noticing that with the latest version 2.2 Froyo, Android is becoming a more unified value proposition leaving Moto's Blur and HTC's Sense UI a more "skinned up" version rather than bringing any real value to the end consumer. There's a lag in firmware updates (that is if a promised firmware update really exists and being tested) I can only assume that OEMs make most of their money buy selling devices - the love and support for updates is perhaps not in their best interest. Some of them would love it if you switch android device every 4 months instead of supporting regular firmware updates. Google's is working on a unified UI plan as we speak, wich I hope gives me the end user a choice:

--> Buying an HTC phone I get HTC's Sense UI and the plain vanilla one, I can switch freely and update OTA when a new vanilla version arrives or wait months for the "tailored Sense UI update" (problem: HTC Sense UI is deeply integrated in the system) There should be some UI framework for OEM's instructing them: tailor the UI whatever however you like, remember the delicate balance when future firmwares arrives - it might get a bit messy if you deeply integrate your implementations in the system --> it might lead to unhappy buyers waiting for an update or left in the cold with an outdated device.


A tip for you as a buyer
Observe how current OEMs like Samsung, Motorola, HTC, SonyEricsson, Dell, Acer and others are performing in this field. Do they release frequent updates, how deeply integrated are these cosmetic UIs, have they publicly announced a new firmware update, do you have the choice to replace the UI without messing around with the device. Stay away from OEM's that fits this profile: "Hey if you wan't an up to date firmware, buy a new device instead" I can name a few without blinking, they just want to spit out new devices, be ahead of the pack - remember whether you are a buyer or a hardware manufacturer: trying to be a technology leader comes with a price. A tip for you as a buyer I'd go for a device that comes really close to Nexus One in hardware specs like the HTC Desire. The Nexus One is a device that gets frequent updates ahead of the rest and you're pretty much sitting in the front row of Google's firmware support - no OEMs lovely looking icons and implementations standing in your way of having an up-to-date device.

Keepin' it real - Android is a bit rough cornered!
Android is hot right now but beware of what features you expect being fully supported. Some of these are for me considered as dealbreakers for others a minor annoyance, not the end of the world. Depends once again on your usage patterns - for instance I use universal search alot and not having the mail or calendar posts supported is a no go. Android is hot right now but beware of what features you expect being fully supported. Yes, my subjective opinion of android is that it's a bit rough cornered. There are some dealbreakers when using an Android device daily. I'm not going to list them all and some (or all of them are irrelevant to some of you reading this post but it's a way to explore what shortcomings matters to you and wich ones you can live without) 

Some of my top Android dealbreakers (on a Nexus One device) 

Built-in Google docs / Blogger support:
Without google docs and blogger editing nexus one is disappointing..
gdocs breaks my docs - links, pictures, italics, etc everything disappears

Proxy settings:
lack of proxy settings in Android 2.0. It should be a common setting in the browser. How do you add a proxy settings for wifi connections? why no proxy for wlan?

Lack of Support for external calendars via iCal / CalDav:
And one of the biggest dealbreakers for me:
For people without Exchange servers that wish to access "work" calendars
where syncing with Google is not an option, direct access to a calendar via
iCal / CalDav would be a nice feature.

Calendar and email in universal search is missing:
If you rely on the mail client and calendar daily - there's still no way to use the universal search to look up mails and calendar entries. 

Maemo goes after web natives. Who? and Why are they important?
[info]swestar

I read Skyler Visconti's article N900... the hype buster and he starts with the following sentences:

"The tradition of the Internet Tablets (ITs) 770, N800, N810, & N810WME is aimed at ultra portable computing. The latest edition, the N900 adds just one more wireless technology."

Skyler calls the N900 an ultra portable computing device, Nokia calls it Internet tablet, Intel calls it Mobile Internet Device (MID) and so on.

Well if they're not your all typical cellphone then to whom are these gadgets targeted for?

Apparently Symbian and Maemo doesn't target the same user groups, according to a Nokia rep on twitter, he answered the question with the following answer:

"Maemo and Symbian will cater to different audiences. Maemo goes after the lead users & web natives."

Who are they, why are they important and is it just a fancy word marketers use to seperate user groups?

http://www.johannaformochdesign.se/bilder/tavlor/tavlor_indian.gif

The world of web natives: Are you a one of us?
The webnatives has somewhat different user habits than your regular phone user. It’s important for these people to daily operate on the web where visits to popular webservices are part of their regular routines. They are somewhat heavy Internet users, likes to be on the cutting edge and be willing to try anything and everything out on their own. No, these types of people leading the social Web doesn’t need to be master programmers or multimedia experts. Hardly. But they at least try — and more importantly, understand — the features and how they might suit their purpose.

Why are web natives important?
The influence internet, social networks and webservices has on the cellphone market is already evident, its operations can only thrive when they are staffed by people who get the Web, enjoy using the Web and most importantly leads the laggy majority into the realm of these new user habits. These are people who categorically prefer the Web over print publications.

  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories

Nokia going Capacitive touch end of 2009?!
[info]swestar
Ok I'm tired of this speculating around resistive vs capacitive spins that goes on forever it seems. The Nokia N900 is resistive but that's not all, await the Nokia World annoncement, couple of days left.

To all those craving for capacitive touch from Nokia, One of my contacts at Nokia double checked with Eldar, seems legit enough to me!

I asked this exact question to Eldar at twitter: I got a tip from a XXXX at nokia research, they're releasing capacitive touchscreens end of 2009, any truth in that?

eldarmurtazin@swestar yes

So there you have it folks!

The N900 - a potential developers point of view!
[info]swestar

So we've been discussing the buzz around the N900 and we took the whole a spin from a marketings point of view.
What does potential developers think about the N900 and it's potential impact on the community?
Especially the ones coming from an old N800 Maemo device with skills as a part time apps developer for the Iphone OS.

Linux Hackernut
I've had a chat with a fella with somewhat interesting programming background and loves to call himself the Linuxhackernut and loves to take on new challenges. Many linux "gurus" in the community are buzzing about N900, this guy in particular has been working and monitoring closely the Maemo 5 SDK. Due to respect for his wishes - I'm afraid the conversations are somewhat off the record so to speak, the person wants to remain unknown because he wants to keep his profile private, more dedicated and credible to the communities he's involved in and at the Maemo.org community -  so I'll just cite some of the comments with permission to the author here:


Conversation @swestar with "the linux hackernut"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Long wait but good news! Maemo is in a sense (shifting?) replacing S60

It's natural step it'll be used on phones, open platform no code haritage holding it back.

> Nokia is providing powerful well known tools for us to play with. S60 - big turnoff :(

> Maemo appstore? Look at how Linux community works and learn from it.

Meaning let the essential apps run free like Ubuntu, exclusive company apps payable!

> I developed apps for iPhone OSX as well ;) for fun to try the framework, it's ok, good payment system.

With the multiple core framework tools running inside, the N900 is an evolutionary step above the iPhone OSX.

> I imagine if the N900 gets some better games, it's already in the works from companies who make the Zeemote!

> What's impressed me with the most N900? MAFW (Media Application Framework 4 Maemo) 

Seriously this by itself will make OS2008/Diablo look like a toy!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Own thoughts - well that's one developers opinions, not sure this applies to many potential developers out there. One thing is certain it'll be interesting reading the community of developers reaction of the N900 after the official release at Nokia World and measure the impact at the Maemo summit and see how much attention the event gets..

If you wanna retwitt or use this comments, ask permission first / Swestar


Nokia's bending the rules, new ways of releasing devices?
[info]swestar
The buzz right now on the net about the Nokia N900 and it's unofficial release. We have a preview of a device and a completely new platform by a guy who isn't an official representative at Nokia and belongs somwhere in the middle of being in the blogsphere at the same time well connected with the cellphone manufacturers. The funny part about all of this is there's still no official reaction at Nokia Headquarters (they're beeing silent till the official release at Nokia World beginning of September)
What's even more interesting is observing the twitts where I hear claims of how one man, a reviewer / blogger that runs his own site, an analyst with years of experience in the cellphone industry beats Nokia to it and spills out the beans before the official announcement. The twitts goes on and on with things like:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Think these 1744 people working hard on these devices are happy when someone spoil their work before the show?

What's the point in spoiling the fun of people going to Nokia World, why don't you wait Wednesday 3rd?

(these twitts are a fraction of longer conversations surrounding the topic)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nokia has a long tradition of supporting the blogcommunity and I can give you handful of viral marketing campaigns targeted at bloggers, dating back to 2003 all the way from N-series, Ngage to the recently released N97. They also have a long and somwehat "unlucky" tradition of failing to keep some leaks a secret a bit longer than planned.

Now you're thinking, so what if this guy leaks or spills the beans first?

If you digg deeper - maybe this is part of Nokia's transformation in to an internet company? Learning from the big american PR wheels at Apple and Google. Now Google does this all the time, releasing new beta services to the public blogging community - think about Google Wave and Google Chrome OS, they're far from finished services but still they leverage from the support of the community saying this is what we're working on and we want you to be a part of it.

Maybe instead of stealing the thunder, going the bloggosphear way is another way of "releasing" the device and part of the PR and market communication strategies. How big of a procent would you honestly predict the leaks out there are unintentional? If a manufacturer gives somewhat of a green light and encourage rumours, leaks to keep the interest alive then it's part of the communication entity they try to broadcast by all channels necessary whether it's an "official=confirmation" release or spilling out some beans of the device to trusted bloggers - either way it reinforces the marketing strategy purpose whether it's to increase the device's desire, keeping the interest alive, create some brand attention etc. One thing is for sure, this release is targeted at gadget enthusiasts, they tend to read the tech blogs and what better way to inform them? In short, different channels - unified marketing message!
Sometimes this strategy missfires - unintentional leaks might force the company to act faster and release an unfinished device with alot of software bugs depending on importance and strategy priorities. The time gap between expected release and actual shipments might cripple the device in terms of competition, announcing a highend device is one thing and shipping it 6-8 months later is something else, competition won't wait for your shipments. 

The marketing impact of this buzz is hard to measure but there are ways to it of course, with very simple questions following marketing practises (though it's harder to digg up the numbers behind the answers)
- Reach: How fast did this release hit the aimed top cellphone blogs on the net?
- Target: How many target readers did actually read this news?
- Impact: What's the activity/reaction on blogs, social channels, twitts and forums?

Only Nokia knows if it's reached it's marketing objectives regarding this "unofficial" release of this new device and platform. Perhaps we will see more of these types of releases in the future depending on how successful the impact Nokia think it had.

You are viewing [info]swestar's journal